Scholarly Comments on Academic Economics

Decline in Critical Commentary, 1963–2004

by

Abstract

Over the past four decades, top economics journals have virtually eliminated critical commentary (comments, replies, rejoinders, and the like). This article shows the data and discusses these steep declines in critical commentary. To the extent that critical commentary is beneficial to scientific inquiry, editorial opposition to critical commentary is detrimental to the advancement of economic knowledge.

in

Download this article

Volume (Issue)
Pages
355-361
Published
JEL classification
A10, A11, B40
Keywords
Critical commentary, scientific inquiry, debate, editorial policy, prejudice, error, reliability, animosity, vanity
Downloads
4071 article downloads
6197 complete issue downloads
Total: 10268

Discuss this article!