Scholarly Comments on Academic Economics

When the White House Changes Party, Do Economists Change Their Tune on Budget Deficits?

by

Abstract

Large budget deficits represent a burden on the future, and debt accumulation eventually poses great problems. Economists writing for the public can either highlight such truths, neglect the issue, or try to allay worries or excuse or justify large budget deficits (as anti-recession policy, for example). Economists affiliated or aligned with one of the parties may be suspected of changing their positions on budget deficits to serve their favored party or win favor with its constituency. This paper investigates selected economists, to see whether their tune changes when the party holding the White House changes. Six economists are found to change their tune—Paul Krugman in a significant way, Alan Blinder in a moderate way, and Martin Feldstein, Murray Weidenbaum, Paul Samuelson, and Robert Solow in a minor way—while eleven are found to be fairly consistent.

in

Download this article

Volume (Issue)
Pages
119-156
Published
JEL classification
A11, A13, E60, E62, H60, H62
Keywords
budget deficits, economists, bias
Downloads
5,195 article downloads
3,668 complete issue downloads
Total: 8,863

Discuss this article!