Read this article
- Access statistics
- 7,636 article downloads
- 5,542 complete issue downloads
- Total: 13,178
Professor Gavin Kennedy’s essay on the invisible hand raises several issues: (1) whether the three occurrences of the phrase in Adam Smith’s writings are reconcilable; (2) whether the phrase may properly serve as tag for an important idea in natural jurisprudence; and (3) the importance Smith attached to the phrase. In line with A.L. Macfie, I argue that the three occurrences are reconcilable, and, in line with a great many others, that the phrase may properly serve as a tag for the comparative merit of liberty. Whether Smith intended for the phrase to be used that way is uncertain, but does not matter much to its serviceability.
Response to this article by Gavin Kennedy: A Reply to Daniel Klein on Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand (EJW, September 2009).