Scholarly Comments on Academic Economics

Reply to Brendan Beare

by and

Read this article

Access statistics
7,605 article downloads
9,930 complete issue downloads
Total: 17,535


This is our reply to Brendan Beare’s comment on our paper. While we find his criticism to be both valid and helpful, a modified version of our original model still confirms that a low elasticity of substitution between capital and labor doomed the Soviet strategy of extensive growth through capital accumulation.

This article is a response to The Soviet Economic Decline Revisited by Brendan K. Beare (EJW, May 2008).