The United Nations and its Digital Public Goods Alliance (DPGA) have constructed an ambitious framework for certifying, funding, and promoting open-source software in developing countries. Utvik et al. (2025) reconstruct the rapid development of COVID-19 surveillance tools on DHIS2, an open-source platform the DPGA certifies as a digital public good. Theirs is the most detailed account of the episode on record, and I rely on it throughout. They explain the innovation as resulting from a “generative fit,” an alignment of architecture, governance, and community. I read the same evidence differently. Dispersed local knowledge, in Hayek’s sense, and the voluntary coordination Ostrom found in self-governing commons, accomplished what generative fit is credited with. Local professionals identified the need, built the tools, and shared them through voluntary channels. The international standard followed a week or two later. A fit says nothing about how it came about. It permits treating alignment as an input a central body can engineer. Certification, pooled funding, and coordinated deployment all presume the same thing. What this episode shows is a spontaneous order. It therefore does not support the UN’s framework for managing how such an order arises.